“Even more cringe than Fraser’s acting”: Despite Martin Scorsese Defending Brendan Fraser, Fans Lash Out At Studio’s “Cringey” Post
Brendan Fraser’s portrayal in Martin Scorsese’s recent release, Killers of the Flower Moon, sparked intense online criticism when the film first came out last month. Many viewers expressed disappointment and frustration with his performance, which led to a flood of negative comments on social media. However, despite the initial backlash, the Canadian-American actor managed to not only weather the storm but also earn the respect and admiration of none other than the legendary director himself, Martin Scorsese.
However, the controversy surrounding Fraser’s performance took another turn recently when Apple Films, the distributor of Killers of the Flower Moon, posted a tweet defending Brendan Fraser’s role in the film. This tweet, meant to be a show of support, reignited the debate among fans, critics, and movie-goers. It seems that the online film community remains divided over Fraser’s portrayal, with passionate defenders and critics on both sides.
Brendan Fraser Receives Martin Scorsese’s Unwavering Support for His Performance
Brendan Fraser’s role in Martin Scorsese‘s Killers of the Flower Moon is a notable aspect of the film’s third act. Despite entering the narrative relatively late in the story, Fraser’s portrayal of lawyer W.S. Hamilton manages to leave a significant and lasting impression. The online response to Brendan Fraser’s performance has been marked by divisiveness, with some viewers expressing disappointment with his role. However, amidst the mixed online reactions, there is one voice that stands out in support of Fraser’s work, and it’s none other than the film’s director, Martin Scorsese.
Martin Scorsese, celebrated for his discerning cinematic standards, staunchly praises Brendan Fraser’s role in Killers of the Flower Moon. In a prominent interview, Scorsese defends Fraser against online criticism, hailing him as the perfect fit for the character W.S. Hamilton. He also emphasizes Fraser’s chemistry with lead actor Leonardo DiCaprio and his ability to shine alongside the accomplished co-star.
Apple Studios’ Controversial Defense of Brendan Fraser’s Performance
This week, Apple Studios addressed the ongoing Brendan Fraser controversy in their adaptation of Killers of the Flower Moon by sharing a book passage on social media. The tweet featured a snippet of dialogue from Fraser’s character, attorney W.S. Hamilton, emphasizing the use of an exclamation point to subtly defend his performance.
However, Apple Studios’ decision to address the criticism in a public and somewhat unconventional manner by posting an excerpt from the source material with a specific focus on punctuation raised eyebrows among fans and critics alike. The response to Apple’s tweet was, predictably, quite divisive. Some fans and supporters of Brendan Fraser saw it as a clever way to highlight the source material’s authenticity and, by extension, the actor’s dedication to his role.
I get trying to defend an actor’s performance, but it feels like the studio doing so in a cringy post on social media is just feeding the flames of criticism.
— josh (@joshua_the_hutt) October 26, 2023
The official Apple Films justifying an actor’s performance is even more cringe than Fraser’s acting in the movie
— Zéz (@zez_gval) October 26, 2023
This is kinda weird, I don’t think you should have to justify his performance
— Y (@YashVNC) October 25, 2023
This is stupid. Take this down. Brendan Fraser is great. Acting is interpretation. Don’t cheapen his performance by saying he did it right because punctuation in the book supports it. Ridiculous. Insulting. Ignorant. 🤬
— MKFanWhoHatesTwitr (@MK93Fan) November 3, 2023
I have to say I’ve never seen a distributor go on social media to defend an actor’s performance lol https://t.co/9QXNybfSFH
— chase (@sonnerly) October 26, 2023
On the other hand, many critics and skeptics perceived this tweet as an attempt to deflect the ongoing negative feedback and, in some cases, perceived it as somewhat cringeworthy. They argued that such a response only served to fuel the existing flames of criticism by not directly addressing the concerns and instead emphasizing a seemingly trivial detail. The episode underscored the complex relationship between film studios, social media, and the often vocal and passionate audience.